this from 'sikovace' on iii:
"Is anyone else curious about the notable absence of any references to  blnx in anything miniweb related?
 Yes we had the initial tie up RNS but very little since.I don't see the  point of championing other companies and posting up reams of links when  they don't mention blnx.
 With SC's ability to lose focus and direction I wouldn't be at all  suprised to see the miniweb tie up just drift away.
 The facts of the matter are that in the past 6 months the sp has dropped  by a third having only ever gone up significantly on unfounded rumours.
 Lloyds have dumped a big holding as have others over the past year and  blnx had to raise funds for an urgent aquisition which never  materialised.
 Communications have dried up to just a trickle and that trickle is  irrelevant tosh that has no bearing on the sp or its' position.
 There are more reasons to be concerned about blnx than excited. "
Well it if turns out that the much-vaunted MIniweb deal doesn't actually materialise, I wonder how many there will be then to defend Blinkx management?
Tuesday, 23 March 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment