A STRATEGIC U-turn by Hewlett-Packard soured its
relationship with Autonomy, the Cambridge software company it bought
last year for $10.3 billion (£6.6 billion), according to the British
company’s founder.
Mike Lynch, who made a shock exit from the business last week, told The
Sunday Times that HP’s decision to continue focusing on making computers
was at the root of the breakdown in relations.
“We went into the deal with our eyes open. We were just unlucky that it
coincided with the turmoil at the top of HP,” said Lynch.
“Once it became clear that the new chief executive’s strategy was
staying more with hardware, it meant some rethinking of the original
plan, and its focus on our independence became blurred.”
HP’s acquisition of Autonomy was the idea of Leo Apotheker, who became
chief executive in November 2010. He wanted to ditch HP’s manufacturing
operations and concentrate on software and services. The Californian
company is the world’s largest PC maker.
Apotheker was ousted in September, a fortnight before the Autonomy deal
finally went through. His replacement, Meg Whitman, reversed the
decision to stop making hardware.
Lynch said he still rated the HP leadership. “I have a great deal of
respect for Whitman, and for her senior management team. I have learnt a
lot,” he said.
“HP is one of America’s great technology companies. She and the team
have a big turnaround job to do, and I wish her and HP the best.”
Separately, insiders at Autonomy said matters came to a head when the
company’s sales administration was switched to HP’s systems. The
mismatch led to paralysis, with deals bound up in red tape, one former
executive claimed.
“There were 47 straight quarters of revenue growth, and in the 48th a problem,” a source said.
HP rejected accusations of interference and bureaucracy. The claims were
“baloney”, according to a source close to management. “What triggered
Lynch’s departure was a very significant miss on revenue [targets] and
there was no real sense that he could recover from that,” the Silicon
Valley insider said.
It is thought that Autonomy’s revenues in the first three months of this year undershot forecasts by about one-third.
“You don’t miss the numbers by that range and keep your job when you
work for Meg,” the source said. “You can’t have it both ways. Mike
insisted on, and was given, autonomy. What we didn’t do was give him the
ability to miss his targets by that margin.”
HP insisted that the way Autonomy accounts for its new contracts is
solid, despite unease among some London analysts about its dizzying
rates of revenue growth.
Sunday, 27 May 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment